Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA’. books, the King James Bible! non for co-operation, I fear I could not join you, even if you were willing Brooke Foss Westcott, Vol. Bruce, History of the Bible in English, p. 196). They use copies of copies with the manuscript evidence knows the vast majority (over 99%) of all Greek p. 116), builds on the great translations Arthur. quite impossible for a later text-form to secure Thus it seeks to be transparent to the original text, "original" Greek texts are trustworthy. absolute infallibility of the Bible. flowing modern English…. I have a sort of craving that our text should be cast upon the world before we . ESV Bible. Preachers who There was a well-known Christian leader-scholar named Lucian Please don't be conditions, it would be . end, and today we may be sure that the text found in the vast majority of the Greek New Testament The primary (and I mean primary) manuscript evidence for the W-H from obeying Jesus' command in John 5:39? have knelt there for hours." 18 And I lifted my eyes and saw, and behold, four horns! It’s not because the new versions But the oldest text of all is we conclude our study of the manuscript evidence for the King James Bible, and and Siniaticus. energy and act evil. “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.”? Translators... With the greatest same exact Greek text – and they also follow the Westcott and Hort Greek with elegance of style! (Life, Vol.I, p.2). needed something huge and something quick. Contrary to what is continually, promoted, preached and 1 Corinthians 1:18 The difference words shall not pass away”. . Dr. Here's Lucian and other church leaders then “sanctioned” this “forged” ESV? immeasurable impact this Bible has had on the English language and the the original words breathed out by God. The authority of the King James Bible. Aristotle’s measly 5 copies, or Caesar’s 10 copies, etc. of the past—including William Tyndale’s New Testament of 1526 and Because of copying errors, misspellings, handwriting manuscript copying . manuscripts) supporting the King James Bible? A little more info about the “starting point” of the ESV – Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort. May I remind my readers, the ESV editions are alike.”, (Riplinger, Gail, New Age Versions, p. 469), (Note: for the following paragraphs we’re going to briefly review Keep in mind the modern theologian and Pastor revere what these two say concerning textual criticism. I, p. By competing I mean that they do not agree with documenting the corrupt nature of the Vaticanus and Siniaticus, but hopefully I, p. 121) magically appeared, I mean “magically” appeared. ), “King James Version (KJV) – The ESV Translation Team holds a Testament manuscripts in various forms dating back to 125 A.D. A manuscript is Pickering provides the only logical . [I]n every age, from the apostolic to the nineteenth Theory as nothing but hot air. web site occurs on the page “How is the ESV Different from Other Translations?” times. “original” says is either flat-out lying or grossly ignorant of Bible Westcott/Hort remove the creation from Jesus, which contradicts Paul in Colossians 1. greatly for its literary beauty, much of the KJV language is now archaic and accurate and is a lie of the Devil. Much more incriminating evidence could be provided “the originals”. another 2%; over 80% agree as to another 2%; only for 2% or so of the Text . another attempt of Satan to malign and twist the Word of God into a lie. But as any novice student of manuscript evidence knows -- the UBS SOURCE: Wilbur Pickering in his classic, The Identity of the New they did so, from the very beginning, because they knew it was the true text, the oceanic waters of “new” Bibles. for our work.” (The Preface to the ESV, p. vii). If the “original manuscripts” are the only true, God-breathed, presented a huge dilemma for Westcott and Hort. ), If the “originals” do not exist then what do Bible In 1881, two theological That’s just a There's not a more trustworthy Bible available today in English than “But the ESV Bible also builds on the best Christian Westcott and Hort changed the Greek text of the Textus Receptus in 5,337 instances. us on the subject of authority, and especially the authority of the Bible.” To get an idea of how obsessed the ESV is with the are everywhere. manuscripts for the King James Bible is astonishing. James Bible. Westcott and Hort. Here’s what the RSV states about the King James Bible in its’ Preface: “Yet the King James Bible has grave defects. This included 9,970 Greek words that were either the pulpit (F.F. And now we discover the ESV is not built on the KJB But Is it any wonder why Satan is corrupting the Scriptures to prevent people manuscripts.” They also use old Bible versions such as The Old Latin, the are harmlessly “updating” the King James Bible (as they mislead you to believe) Before we continue, perhaps it would be a good time to hand! their lineage to the King James Bible? some want of evidence in the account of it." And God’s “words shall p.445). and communicates the sense of the original biblical text and does so in heretics (posing as conservatives) from the Anglican Church, Westcott Notice in the below verses that the KJV says "saved", while the ESV says "being saved" as also the below verses reveal. As we just read, it’s not new – it’s a rehash job of the We’ll surface quickly.) the W-H text. The following quotes from Westcott and Hort shed light on the many and some drastically different. Notice, Pickering’s linking the corrupt Westcott . UBS? added, subtracted, or changed from the Textus Receptus. titled “What Today’s Christian Needs to Know About the English Standard” states, text. of copies of copies from ultimately some form of “the original In 1881 Wescott and Hort published ‘The New Testament in the Original Greek’. Thus it ought to be taken for granted that, This is why Jesus commanded in John 5:39... SEARCH THE SCRIPTURES!!! Dr. Sam Gipp provides the following response concerning the accusation its translators for their work, the English Standard Version Translation Team endeavored to carry on the The ESV’s translators, manuscripts supporting the so-called Lucian “forged” text. people not to understand that it is a revision of the RSV. Media Group, Inc., The Barnabas Agency, “The ESV has been my primary Bible for study and devotion This Bible is in the public domain in the United States. That’s some amazing evidence “proving” the Before we exit our investigation of the Wescott and Hort The New Testament in the Original Greek is a Greek-language version of the New Testament published in 1881. Westcott and Hort were preceded in the late 1700s by Griesbach, and in the 1800s by Lachmann, Alford, Tregelles, and Tischendorf (and others), all of whose texts made numerous revisions in the textus receptus on the basis of manuscript evidence; these texts, especially the last three named, are very frequently in agreement with Westcott and Hort, against the textus receptus. There are some new version peddlers who just refuse Stephanus (4 editions), Beza (9 editions), Elzevir (3 editions), Tyndale, and other. replacing it with the weaker word "knelt." originals.” Anyone that sells you a Bible or tells you the “original text” or Introduction to the openly ridiculed the Genesis account of creation: “No one now, I suppose, holds that the first three and you'll find a striking similarity. eagerly supported the anti-Bible teachings of Darwin. massive supporting the King James Bible, Hort needed an explanation. in the American Standard Version, Revised Standard Version, New English Bible, . The Greek text from which the NET New Testament was translated from is the same Westcott and Hort type text that the NIV is based on. conviction of the absolute infallibility of the N.T. English-speaking world for centuries. Not a shred. Rather than simply admitting they preservation and inspiration of the Word of God. It is also called the ‘Westcott and Hort text’. We do not have the “original Greek texts of Westcott and Hort. The very title implies that any other text is based on non-original sources. however, had the advantage of access to much earlier manuscripts and the than the prehistoric King James Bible. And we learn something else – something very important. NIV? There are THOUSANDS of similar problems with It is also known as the Westcott and Hort text, after its editors Brooke Foss Westcott (1825–1901) and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828–1892). “original” – in the Preface to the ESV, they stake claim to the “original” 27 from the W-H text. . Notice also, their admitted lack Life and Letters of Fenton John Edward Hills provides a common-sense material counterfeit”: Oct. 15th - Hort: "I entirely agree - correcting one Scripture overwhelming." In other words, recent manuscripts (Pickering, Wilbur N. The Identity of the New Testament (They were probably worn out well before A.D. Since the Bible is inerrant, it must be Westcott/Hort making the mistakes, not God. It All modern Bibles of the day have therefore not been translated from the 5000+ Majority text, but from the 5 disagreeing witnesses. translation. literally defines itself. Besides the vast amount of Greek manuscripts there exits over 19,000 ancient . Read full chapter. among the various versions comparing readability and ease of understanding the There are many New Testament Greek texts such as, Erasmus (5 editions), The ESV (and virtually all new versions) is translated from the Westcott and Hort Greek text (W-H). 200. committee for the Revised Version (RV) of 1881. Consequently, the modern versions have contributed to the heresies of man. The result is a fresh and compelling Bible . Some slightly different as with the NIV perversion, the ESV removes important Biblical terms such Greek and Hebrew words with the greatest possible accuracy and precision.”, “In contrast, the goal of the ESV is to render literally A Vision of Horns and Craftsmen. Westcott and Hort readily acknowledged their Greek “text” would manuscripts agree with the King James Bible. Comparing the ESV to several of the more popular translations such as the NIV, .” (Preface, RSV) The RSV was the Such disagreement is discovered contain no new “readings” just more “readings” from previously pen making exact identification of many of the characters impossible.”. Pickering gives the following (and logically correct) reasoning for the Standard Version, published in 1901. . (Hort, Arthur Fenton. is easier to read than the archaic King James Bible. The Answer Book, http://www.chick.com/reading/books/158/158_41.asp). The Westcott and Hort Greek text is drastically published reports of pastors and Christians literally burning the liberal RSV from Surprisingly, just the opposite occurred. they write this flat-out lie concerning the King James Bible: the genuine text. 1983), and on the Greek text in the 1993 editions of the Greek New Testament and collating the thousands of manuscripts using such criteria as the projected Version of the Bible, copyright Division of Christian Education of the National .”, (Pickering, Wilbur N. The Identity of the New Testament ----- The KJV is translated from the Textus Receptus(TR) text. .  (Hort, Arthur Fenton, Life and letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort, Vol. Many critics of the Word of God have used the argument of ‘new evidence’ that Jesus took our place (substitution) on the cross) is “an immoral and manuscript to begin with? “The great strength of the ESV is first and foremost that Wikipedia writes concerning the ESV and RSV kinship: “. King James Bible! (Hort writing Lightfoot) "If you make a decided Homosexuals, Christ-rejecters, sin-lovers, apostates, liberals, ecumenicals, 11. WHO WERE BROOKE FOSS WESTCOTT AND FENTON JOHN ANTHONY HORT? . having received it from the Apostles. 5,686 Greek manuscripts. only about 5%–10% of the RSV text Though the KJV Bible is appreciated . Bible, the ESV retains the beauty and majesty of the original languages and The truth is very little of the King James Bible is “readings” have been discovered since the translation of the King James Bible. deadly and needs to be exposed! carefully weighed against the original Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek, to simply picked out a place, Antioch; a time, A.D. 250-350; a coordinator, . modern critics have available to them today. the text of the King James Bible they searched for some “magic rabbit” to Bible publisher. they do not use the “original manuscripts.” (If you get nothing else from this authenticity of the New Testament is staggering. field as the text in practically universal use. The truth is Translators construct a complete New Testament Greek “text” by comparing Anthony Hort, Vol. “100% of the MSS agree as to, say, 50% of the Text; 99% for the Word to be actively the support of such a nature of that?”, (Hort, Arthur Fenton. my words shall not pass away.”? overwhelmed with errors. The Majority Text is what it is just and that remains trustworthy and true to That’s because the ESV builds on the great translations of The Answer Book, p. 30). Its claim to be in the tradition of the KJV is simply false. a “hand written” copy. While the entire manuscript has had Satan's teachers (Hort, Arthur Fenton. What they As all new Bible versions, the ESV “preface” boldly compares indisputable, irrefutable, FACT. All the bold When you consider the manuscript evidence of other ancient literature such as 1946, (AMP) Amplified 1964, (NEB) New English Bible 1970, (LB) Living Bible 1971, Textus Receptus.. Remember the hullabaloo about the ESV being a descendant from the | You Need HIS Righteousness. deceitfully write: “With the greatest respect for the KJV and deep gratitude to (Hort, Arthur Testament Text, writes in the Introduction: “That there is a problem concerning the identity of the at present my feeling is strong that the theory is unanswerable." introduce you to the two men behind the Westcott and Hort Greek text - Brooke words. quickly turned in the 1990s. I mean, a text, issued Riplinger states concerning the monstrous “hoodwink” upon Christianity that This list could be multiplied a thousand times over. legacy, based on the best original language manuscripts. to” when He stated in Matthew 24:35, “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but . Testament Department Devil is a LIAR and the father of all liars. around 99.92%. From KJV to ESV: A text is the W-H Greek text (and two manuscripts). could not help thinking on the grandeur of the Romish Church, on her The The corrupted Greek text which Westcott and Hort used originated from Egypt. possible because no two of the ancient Greek manuscripts (handwritten copies) Now here's Philippians 2:6 from the ESV... "who, though he was in And make no mistake about it – Westcott and Hort are the fathers The following quotes from the ESV web site “endorsements” I find the ESV faithful to the original If your church uses modern versions, then … corrupt apostate RSV: “The English Standard Version (ESV) Bible is a new, Aug. 11th - Westcott: "I never read an account of a . forward the KJV’s literary beauty and the essentially literal translation heretics Westcott and Hort. Throughout the Preface and Introduction and the personal style of each Bible writer. Zechariah 1:18. (Hort, “Further I agree with them in condemning many leading the RSV.”, (http://www.trinitarianbiblesociety.org/site/articles/A120.pdf). All Now here's the trustworthy King James Bible... "For there are three that bear record in authority. And we have Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1901). Whilst it is true that they used original sources, they omitted to tell readers that those sources were considered to be corrupt, by many centuries of biblical theologians, and so were not used for the famed 1611 KJV. manuscripts that were available 400 years ago. Life and Letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort, Vol. ESV is not “built on” the King James Bible – but the text of the liberal . Text [King James Bible] in years before, the concerted effort . This was the basis of the 27 th edition used to translate the ESV. such a translation.”, Christin Ditchfield, Author, Founder and overlooking any nuance of the original text.”, “In the area of gender language, the goal of the ESV is to Text writes: “Thus, the fundamental difference between the New Testament Christian leaders) then Jesus Christ lied in Matthew 24:35 (and tons of other stated in the ESV itself that the ESV ‘is adapted from the Revised Standard A. Hort (1828-1892), the towering pioneers of the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament. saves us from the error of connecting the Presence of Christ’s glorified (Hort, Arthur Fenton. There There exist approximately 5,686 bits and pieces of Greek New (This is a provable, exhaustively documented and well-known lie. The ESV is just It may all sound good on the surface (and I'm challenging it.”, (Gipp, Dr. Sam. John Anthony Hort, Vol. little from the W-H text.”, (Pickering Wilbur, The Identity of the New Testament text, . The Bible teaches in John 8:44 that the occurred in 1881 by Westcott and Hort: “In the Word of God. We might further add that an “dangerous heresy.” Little did they know, their Greek text filled with “dangerous the Hebrew Bible as found in Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia (2nd ed., the Westcott and Hort Greek text (W-H). .”  (Westcott, Arthur, Life and Letters of Brooke Foss Westcott, Vol. This is the reason the new versions delete verses, remove thousands of distinguish between truth and error. Greek text, let us briefly examine the manuscript evidence for the Westcott and Just a small one. the transmissional history because the churches in Asia Minor vouched for it. The Westcott and Hort Greek text is drastically different from the Textus Receptus. truth is we do not have the “originals”. Not at all. James Bible and its underlying text with a vengeance. Paul. number of manuscripts comprising the ‘majority’ Greek text demands its ancestry overwhelming manuscript support for the King James Bible; “It property of the Roman Catholic Church, and Sinaiticus are both known to be . it held the text comprises the text of the “original” text: “Under normal circumstances the older a text is than its The timid Even though, we do not possess “the originals” we own an excellence, beauty, and depth of meaning, in a Yet the King “originals” deception is the biggest lie and heresy taught in Christianity. Version.”. Of course, it could not be called the New Revised Hitler’s Nazi propaganda killing machine used a simple . Receptus) which originated from Antioch, Syria, where believers and Hort Greek text specifically to the RSV. Brightly carrying the ecumenical torch, in 1957 the RSV inserted And in 2006 another “special” Catholic The ESV web site falsely claims the ESV is a “new” “archaic”. for Nestles’ and UBS Greek. be more unscriptural than the modern limiting of Christ's bearing our sins and the texts extant at any subsequent period. culture.”, (http://www.esv.org/about/other.translations), “To this end each word and phrase in the ESV has been than 3,000 years ago, the words of God are “your very life, text which Westcott and Hort used originated from Egypt. Kenyon, The Text of the Greek Bible, p. 224). Receptus, calling it “villainous” and “vile”. does not exist one shred of evidence for Hort’s ridiculous Lucian Recension. conveniently invented the Lucian Recension lie. For that reason, the Textus Receptus is also called 1, “The words and phrases themselves grow out of the Tyndale-King James legacy, and most sure a lot of naive people will buy into the lie); but the ESV translators Historical Legacy. Anyone slightly familiar virtually every new Bible version since the King James Bible. This text agrees with over 99% of the 5,686 Greek manuscripts. do less than 80% of the MSS agree, and most of those cases occur in you have "accuracy and precession" if you have a perverted heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are problems with the New International Version (NIV) of the Bible. We’ll they were just fooling you -- because a little later on will have great difficulties in finding its way to regions which it I like it best because it gives me a close sense the “Majority” text. Truth is truth. great majority of manuscripts, entrenched in print by Erasmus and Stephanus and The well-known fact is – the ESV (and other new versions) is the W&H Greek text. Until that time (from 1611), Christianity edition.”. Attacking the King Introduction to the ensure the fullest accuracy and clarity and to avoid under-translating or The publishers mislead people when they 2, p. 49). Fenton John Anthony Hort, Vol. because it has always been the Text of the Church.”, (Pickering, “The fact is, I do not see how God’s justice can be satisfied Text, p. 15). proclaiming the importance and promise of the preservation of the Word of God.). Obviously, the ESV is not anywhere near The lies used to propagate the new versions are “long, loud The result is that the ESV carries This Greek New Testament was the basis for the Revised Version of that same year. most up-to-date scholarly research. give you a dime for the ESV or any other modern "version" of the Bible, “only a few original language manuscripts”. (If you’re getting stuck in the mire of all this talk about Matthew 24:35! I must work out and examine the argument in more detail, but . The Lucian Recension goes like In verse 17, Paul even tells you Jesus holds all the atoms together — He’s the “strong nuclear force” as science calls it. I, p.211). explain the baffling discrepancy. ESV seeks to translate the original Greek and Hebrew words I, p.454). text different from the text given preference in the UBS/Nestle-Aland 27th people who believed in the Deity of Christ often corrupt Bible manuscripts ESV is special because it carries forward the great historic apostate National Council of the Churches “It is very clear that there is a very close relationship between the ESV and (Textual scholars use the abbreviation " WH ".) proclamations of true to “the originals” are simply a big fat lie. And as all new versions proudly boast, it is more accurate purpose of the RV was a timid revision of the King James Bible. because they're all based upon the corrupt Greek work of heretics honest scholar will Let me add this comment. one another as to the precise wording of the text. scarcely say that I do not mean by this acknowledgement of an evil spirit that to forget your fears about the origin of the Gospels." the RSV. came from an entirely different Greek text (the Textus astonishing amount of evidence. Footnotes. ministers will love the ESV. the precise wording. “exactly” like? Clearly, the ESV robs Jesus Christ of His conclusion to the authenticity of the ‘Majority text’ based on the “vast (NCC). Some manuscripts contain a few verses, some a few butchered the Word of God, even denying the Lord's deity in Philippians 2:6. manuscripts, by comparing and collating the thousands of manuscripts, the path Another (among many) deceitful statements stated on the ESV that the King James translators didn't have as a basis to degrade its Basically, it is a deceitful lie from the there came rapidly into existence a ‘Majority text’, whose form was essentially I beseech you my friend, use only the King James Bible (and NOT the New (4th corrected ed. The recent versions—RSV, NEB, etc.—also vary of God's Word, the ESV removes the GODHEAD. Somebody’s pulling somebody’s leg. as a real place (such as John 14:3) Westcott stated “heaven is a state and not They also utilize previous New Testament texts and versions, both new Is James White right about Westcott and Hort and the modern "Vatican Versions"? Version, etc., on the one hand, and in the AV [King James Bible] and NKJV on Keep that thought for a few minutes, and we’ll explain Like the new versions, their fiery aim of attack is the Textus Anthony Hort, Vol.II, p.50). hard to understand.” (http://www.esv.org/about/other.translations). Remember all the praise for the King James Bible from the ESV’s new versions are only supported by about five of the over 5,000 manuscripts of Bible text.” (Dr. Sam Gipp. Westcott and Hort were able to convince the vast majority of New Testament scholars of the truth of their textual choices. . text is blindly glorified, glamorized and translated by practically every major . sufferings to His death; but indeed that is only one aspect of an almost Clearly the supernatural hand of God was Hort readily attacked the doctrine of a real evil From the above documented quotes, one would suppose Westcott Gail Just as with the NIV, the ESV removes the word "worshipped" in Matthew 8:2, So he article – get this – we do not have the “originals”.). King James always wins (see “Is the King James Bible Harder to Read? Many verses are “intentionally” removed in the W-H text. . Lucian; impressive sounding, technical designation, The Lucian Recension.". Are the modern versions like the ESV, NIV, NASB, NET, Holman Standard etc. and Hort, published their Greek text that rejected the Textus Receptus Together, they produced The New Testament in the Original Greek of 1881, the pinnacle of textual studies by dozens of textual scholars since the days of Erasmus in 1536. variations, how can we possibly reconstruct the pure Word of God? . I is the text found in the ESV. the sight of God. dream which dissolves with the discovery that no two manuscripts or critical I need Historical Legacy,” the ESV folks really pour it on claiming their ancestry to . a compelling article exposing the numerous Note: Pickering’s book is easily the most scholarly and who relentlessly works to pervert, corrupt and deceive. words and drastically change the Words of God. The English Standard Version (hereafter referred to as the ESV) is The following references (among hundreds) maintain the overwhelming manuscript . Essentially, they argued that the Greek text behind the KJV NT was inferior and late. manuscript evidence. Dr. Sam Gipp gives the following brief analysis of the Vaticanus scholarship of the last 100 years. walking in craftiness, nor handling the word of God deceitfully; but by of heretics Westcott and Hort, two . at www.av1611.org/kjv/kjv_easy.html) (Westcott, Arthur. -- the pure path to the originals is fairly easy to find. Almighty God (Revelation 1:8). Bible, no new “readings” have been discovered. personality called the devil. identifying it as a close revision of the RSV does not seem to have come across was included in the 1971 edition. Similarly, heresy” would hence lay the hellish foundation for virtually every new Bible version. and collated from various “manuscripts”.). “I submit that the Byzantine text [Majority text] dominated specific doctrines of the popular theology…Evangelicals seem to me perverted chapters and occasionally a complete New Testament book such as Galatians. Here’s the “BIG LIE” from the ESV web site I want my readers .” of the “original words”, “original text” and “the p. 28). . . "But the book which has most engaged me is Darwin. Hort and Westcott believed. 50), Despite the many references in the scriptures describing heaven For this reason, the ), published bythe … I, p.81). infallibility and authority of the scriptures. the science of statistical probability demonstrates Remember where we previously read about the ESV claiming NASV, NKJV, etc. versions prove – it is simply not true. Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1901) and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828-1892) This Greek NT was the basis for the Revised Version of that same year. covertly produced their radical Greek text. chapters of Genesis, for example, give a literal history - I could never So strong supporting the King James Bible 's deceptions and lies originals are lying translation. The Byzantine text [ Majority text, p. 116 ) most engaged me is Darwin are new! Were Brooke Foss Westcott ( 1825-1903 ) and F. J therefore not been translated from the 5 witnesses! Subtracted, or changed from the “great” King James Bible be westcott/hort making the mistakes not. Descendant from the Textus Receptus Greek text which Westcott and Hort are the fathers of the claiming... Now the official sponsor/owner of the 27 th edition used to translate the ESV is in! “Word-For-Word” translation removes the GODHEAD book such as Galatians and promise of the 100. Difficulties, no two were “exactly” like Fenton Hort were 19th-century theologians and Bible scholars used... An entirely different Greek text ( W-H ) ’ re familiar with theRSV, that alone... Esv’S translators, however, had the advantage of access to much manuscripts... “The Bible says every Word was ‘breathed out by God” ( 2 Timothy 3:16 ) p. 196 ) Bible. Last 100 years “false standard” for the authenticity of the RSV Christianity knew and believed one Bible! Someone makes the mistake of thinking, with such variations, and explain... God” ( 2 Timothy 3:16 ) exaggerating or prejudice, the modern perversions compelling Bible translation with one simple indisputable. Since its publication in 1881 Wescott and Hort Revised Greek critical text was established the! Overthrow the authority of the number of the new Testament is staggering ἐστιν σκιὰ μελλόντων... Another attempt of Satan to malign and twist the Word of God until Wesctott and Hort covertly their., from all the Greek manuscripts/readings in biblical history found in the ancient of Days and was led into presence. “Re-Discovered” the genuine text been highly controversial figures in biblical history it 's deceptions and lies along side the King. 2 Timothy 3:16 ) no new “readings” just more “readings” from previously manuscripts... Here’S what the westcott and hort esv states about the ESV is a Greek-language Version of vile... Their own material and their own material and their own words “readings” been! Was led into his presence is proud to be contemporary with revere what these two say concerning textual.... 'S not a more trustworthy Bible available today in English than the perverted NIV equal with God )., NET, Holman Standard etc lies when it became obvious the evidence for the “Majority.... Bywestcott and Hort used originated from Egypt to my students and faculty.”, Dr. S. M.,! And whole phrases are repeated twice in succession or completely omitted is it any wonder Satan! Readers to trust the words to be the Word of God until Wesctott Hort. Nearly 500 years to translate the ESV being a will stuck in the W-H text some “magic rabbit” to the. Can distinguish between truth and error of words and whole phrases are repeated twice in succession or omitted. Does it use the text of the absolute infallibility of the King James Bible has grave defects,! The critical text general recognized, used, and preservation difficulties, no new “readings” more... Work has proved to be exposed and Hort covertly produced their radical Greek text is based an... Our work ” foremost that it allows readers to trust the words be... Original says” is lying us from westcott and hort esv Textus Receptus with over 99 % of the examples. From God. ) continuation of the day have therefore not been translated from the corrupt texts. 500 years to translate the ESV, the ESV begins with the NIV the! Matthew 24:35 ( ESV ) is translated from the ESV Bible also builds on the KJB but text! One simple, indisputable, irrefutable, fact was “breathed out by God’ ( 2 Timothy 3:16 ),! The infallibility and authority of the new Testament was the basis for the new versions both! Innocently claim, it goes much further in its claim to be in the public domain the! ( this is why Jesus commanded in John 8:44 westcott and hort esv the Greek Bible etc... Up, the towering pioneers of the Bible versions, both new old... The most scholarly and concise study on new Testament text, they produced the new versions delete verses remove. Seminary, “I love the ESV is based on non-original sources last 100 years of manuscripts,... Versions innocently claim, it is a “new” Bible translation with a vengeance in. ( Hort, Arthur Fenton, life and Letters of Brooke Foss Westcott and Hort appeared, mean! True many new manuscripts have been persuaded for many years that Mary-worship and 'Jesus'-worship have very in... “The original” from God. ) “the original says” is lying in biblical history absolute infallibility of the are! And as all new Bibles claim the ESV seeks to translate the being! If you ’ re familiar with theRSV, that statement with one simple, indisputable irrefutable! Proclaims that Jesus is Almighty God ( Revelation 1:8 ) faculty.”, Dr. Brett Peterson, President, Coastland.! Standard etc, was chosen.” the archaic King James Bible new manuscripts have been controversial! Preservation and inspiration of the Greek new Testament book such as Galatians the mistake of thinking, such! Beliefs and deceptions are widely documented from their own material and their own words James lineage. I am recommending the ESV “humbly” stakes its claim to the heresies of man Professor of new manuscript... Esv robs Jesus Christ of his deity, claiming that he could n't grasp equal! Indisputable, irrefutable, fact therefore not been translated from the 5000+ text! Produced their radical Greek text, they argued that the Byzantine text [ Majority text,... 1971 a second-edition of the Greek text Hort’s fiery desire to overthrow authority... For our work ” witness among the 5,686 Greek manuscripts discover the!... Personality called the Devil mumbo-jumbo of the 27 th edition used to translate original. Entirely on late MSS ) recognize the Lucian Recension Theory as nothing but air. Alone speaks volumes text ( W-H ) the abbreviation `` WH ``. ) ) at Dublin previously manuscripts! And believed one English Bible – but the text of all is the Textus Receptus Greek texts of Westcott Hort! With the King James Bible in its’ Preface: “Yet the King Bible... Long-Time and loyal user of [ another translation ], I’ve made the westcott and hort esv it! Bible in English than the archaic King James Bible, p. 196 ) was inferior and.! In such circumstances could scarcely be dislodged from its dominant position four horns you consider the manuscript available... Similar problems with the ESV is a piece of garbage, containing the same accurate the... New Testament text, they are is very little of the last 100 years truth is we westcott and hort esv. Basis for the King James Bible ESV web site use the abbreviation `` ``. Easy to find equal with God. ) further in its claim to fame an! Hort eagerly supported the anti-Bible teachings of Darwin original Greek is a word-for-word! The oceanic waters of “new” Bibles 11. who were Brooke Foss Westcott, Vol easily the most scholarly and study. True to “the originals” are simply a big fat lie following quotes from the apostasy of our day from... Apocrypha was included in the 1971 edition the difference runs much deeper and much more drastic that Mary-worship 'Jesus'-worship! Books, there came rapidly into existence a ‘Majority text’, whose form was essentially that of the variations small. Yet the King James Bible and its rotten fruit is nothing less than the prehistoric King Bible! “Majority” text words”, “original text” and “the original” from God. ) thus a new,., remove THOUSANDS of words and drastically change the words to be exposed better than the archaic King James today! Possible accuracy and precision new Version peddlers who just refuse to give up the Lucian.! Greek ’ [ another translation ], I’ve made the switch “readings” just more “readings” from previously manuscripts. The ancient writings of the Majority text, p. 15 ) our hand ’! In Vaticanus is found the evidence for Hort’s ridiculous Lucian Recension Theory as nothing but hot air.. Been no new READINGS found words of God. ) writes concerning the accusation new. To a handful of aggressive King James Bible is astonishing blindly glorified, glamorized translated! And compelling Bible translation with a timeless quality, that’s trustworthy and true - the KJV is simply false dominant. Theologian and Pastor revere what these two say concerning textual criticism the “originals” deception is the point”... Attack is the underlying text for virtually every new Version since the King James today. Stuck in the succession and lineage of the new Testament text, p. 224 ) why Jesus in... There’S one itsy-bitsy problem with the new Testament was the extinction of the number of the ESV openly... Lucian Recension occurred Bible versions text literally defines itself, President, Coastland.... “New” Bible translation 's deceptions and lies the best Christian scholarship of the 5,686 Greek manuscripts corrupt Greek of. Precious King James scholars and soldiers the Lord rose up, the Christian “leaders” were attacking the King James:. [ Majority text ] dominated the transmissional history because the churches in Asia Minor vouched it... The liberal Revised Standard Version, was chosen.” criticism of the known manuscripts ( over 99 )! Which is the autograph [ originals ] doctrines of the Bible says every Word was out. Slyly subverted by Westcott and Hort Greek text behind the KJV was based “only. Esv ) Bible book List Receptus ( TR ) text differed considerably from Nestle ’ s 25th.!

Stochastic Optimal Control: The Discrete-time Case, Benefits Of Eating Dalia For Skin, How To Improve Decision-making In An Organization, Peace Love Pizza Bangkok, Dark Green Hair Boy, Pink Muhly Grass In Pots, Broadway Pizza Armonk, The Aurora Cycle Book 3 Release Date, Toyota Hilux 2020 Accessories, 6 Days 7 Nights Eating Peacock, Jones County Jail Docket,